Sara Yousefnejad, juror for Multiple Exposures Gallery's current exhibit, Everything is Alternative, offers insight into her selections and why they make a remarkable show:
Based
on the title of the exhibit, Everything Is Alternative, did you
know what to expect when you entered the gallery? I actually felt quite tortured
by the title of the exhibit and found myself asking friends, family, and
strangers on the Metro what their first thought was when I said Everything is Alternative. The answers ranged from blank stares to
shrugs to babbled explanations of the grunge music movement; most were
non-verbal responses of bewilderment. When I entered the gallery, however, the
show made sense instantly. It would be a show with dissonant, deceiving, and
creative photographic formats and processes, or contemporary photography
practices and explorations. With all the different formats of contemporary
photography, almost everything is alternative.
The
theme Everything Is Alternative was intentionally broad; in your
experience, do broad themes make it easier or harder to put together cohesive
shows? Broadness
in theme does not necessarily dictate the ease or difficulty of putting
together an exhibit. Themes that are open to interpretation, but simultaneously
point to a specific element are the most interesting to me. In Everything is
Alternative, the creative process itself is on display just as much as the
content of the photograph. The photographic subjects in the show range from
children to architectural ruins to hot peppers, but because the creative
process is a major element in all the works, there is cohesion.
Were
there any techniques used in the show that were new to you? Were you drawn to
any specific techniques over others? One
technique that was new to me in the context of digital photography was
hand-toning or hand-coloring. Susan Meyers put a digital image in Photoshop,
converted it to a line drawing, printed it out, and then painted over it with
watercolor. It looked like an original drawing/watercolor so I had to ask her
what it was doing in the photo exhibit! Janet Matthews had an image with a
similar process, but I could see the photographic origin of the image. Meyers'
image had me stumped.
I was
really interested in Clifford Wheeler's image because of its relevance to
contemporary culture, and I was tickled that we could exhibit it right where it
was made. If you can, see the show when Clifford is gallery sitting. This is
for maximum effect of the relevance of his work. *Of course all the MEG members
are lovely and you should see the show whenever you can!
 |
(c) Alan Sislen |
|
What
do you gravitate toward in an image? Were you looking for any common elements
in the images you chose for the show? Medium
and subject, and how they work together or against one another. In
general, I am drawn to the idea of media advancing to the point where it begins
to mimic its original formats. For example, Alan Sislen's infrared
images had such soft textures that they resembled charcoal drawings. Alan's
images depict decrepit architecture, which is of course an interesting subject
when thinking about time, history, progress, and cycles. Before photography was
born, artists would have drawn or painted these structures. As the years
progressed, so did the media and "technology" to capture the
structures. At some point photography became perfect, boring, factual,
accessible to everyone--not just artists. Then artists began thinking about new
and alternative ways to capture their subjects. Yes, the technology of the
medium is still advancing, but the aesthetic cycles back to its origins and
is reminiscent of drawing.
Here's an everyday example: We used to
write on paper notebooks, then typewriters, then word processors, then
computers, then there was the tablet craze. Is writing on a screen with a
stylus pen anymore advanced than writing in a notebook? Again, the technology
advances, but you're in effect doing the same thing you did in grade school
using a paper notebook. In fact, Apple calls computers notebooks.
All
the images in the show were about the medium as much as the message. Marshall McLuhan would have been all over this.
You're
going to Uganda this winter to teach photography to children for a few weeks.
How did you get involved with this project? What is your goal for the
project and how can people who read this support you? I
work in development and fundraising for the Arlington Arts Center, but I am
also invested in the educational programming we have for children. In the
summer, I taught a digital photography workshop to middle and high school
students. We focused on techniques related to composition and story-telling and
used simple cameras to document the people and faces in our neighborhood. The
class was actually part of an international photo exchange for children called This
is My City. The
opportunity presented itself to partner with the Arlington Academy of Hope in
Uganda, and an instructor was needed to travel to Uganda and teach the
workshop. I jumped at the opportunity! It will be my first trip to Africa, and
my first time traveling to another country to conduct an art workshop.
Most
of the children in Uganda have never even seen a camera. None of them have
access to cameras. So, the AAC is hosting a digital camera drive and we hope to
take those cameras over to Uganda to be used in the workshop. If you get a new
camera for the holidays, or you have an old one you don't need anymore, please
email me at sara.yousefnejad@findyourartist.org.
(Note: MEG is serving as a collection point for cameras. You can stop by between 11am-6pm (Thursday 2-9pm) to drop off your donation -- Torpedo Factory Art Center, 3rd Floor).
Everything is Alternative can be seen at
Multiple Exposures Gallery
through November 30th.
--